Interior Architecture
Course Details
KTO KARATAY UNIVERSITY
Faculty of Fine Arts and Design
Programme of Interior Architecture
Course Details
Faculty of Fine Arts and Design
Programme of Interior Architecture
Course Details
| Course Code | Course Name | Year | Period | Semester | T+A+L | Credit | ECTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 00281852 | Historical Development of Space Representation | 4 | Spring | 8 | 2+0+0 | 4 | 4 |
| Course Type | Elective |
| Course Cycle | Bachelor's (First Cycle) (TQF-HE: Level 6 / QF-EHEA: Level 1 / EQF-LLL: Level 6) |
| Course Language | Turkish |
| Methods and Techniques | midterm, homework, final |
| Mode of Delivery | Face to Face |
| Prerequisites | there are no prerequisites |
| Coordinator | - |
| Instructor(s) | Lect. Merve ATMACA |
| Instructor Assistant(s) | - |
Course Instructor(s)
| Name and Surname | Room | E-Mail Address | Internal | Meeting Hours |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lect. Merve ATMACA | A-206 | [email protected] | 7359 | Thursday 10:00-1200 |
Course Content
Understanding the notion of architectural representation, examining its change in the historical process and looking at its types.
Objectives of the Course
To understand the architectural representation tools from past to present. To present solution proposals over a problem through these architectural representations.
Contribution of the Course to Field Teaching
| Basic Vocational Courses | |
| Specialization / Field Courses | |
| Support Courses | X |
| Transferable Skills Courses | |
| Humanities, Communication and Management Skills Courses |
Relationships between Course Learning Outcomes and Program Outcomes
| Relationship Levels | ||||
| Lowest | Low | Medium | High | Highest |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| # | Program Learning Outcomes | Level |
|---|---|---|
| P1 | Having the ability to make environmentally friendly, universal design and planning, taking into account physical, social and economic factors. | 5 |
| P3 | To have knowledge in the history of art and interior architecture on a national and international scale | 2 |
Course Learning Outcomes
| Upon the successful completion of this course, students will be able to: | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| No | Learning Outcomes | Outcome Relationship | Measurement Method ** |
| O1 | Explaining the relationship between environment and human being | P.1.7 | 1 |
| O2 | Learn to use dimensional and functional basic needs of human-environment interaction in design | P.1.8 | 1 |
| O3 | Ability to connect environment and interior space | P.1.9 | 1 |
| O4 | To comprehend the historical meaning of interior architecture, to follow the developments of the periods and to analyze their differences | P.3.1 | 1,7 |
| ** Written Exam: 1, Oral Exam: 2, Homework: 3, Lab./Exam: 4, Seminar/Presentation: 5, Term Paper: 6, Application: 7 | |||
Weekly Detailed Course Contents
| Week | Topics |
|---|---|
| 1 | Explaining course content and midterm / final assignments |
| 2 | What is the drawing / the act of drawing? |
| 3 | Why do people draw? Why does a space designer draw? |
| 4 | Architectural representation notion |
| 5 | History of architectural representation |
| 6 | History of architectural representation (continue) |
| 7 | Architectural representation methods |
| 8 | Mid-term |
| 9 | Identifying problems and discussion / creating student groups |
| 10 | Presenting data about the problem |
| 11 | Reading the problem solution through architectural representations |
| 12 | Reading the problem solution through architectural representations |
| 13 | Reading the problem solution through architectural representations |
| 14 | Reading the problem solution through architectural representations |
Textbook or Material
| Resources | Akçakoca, M. (2018).Müge Akçakoca, Yeni nesil çizim. İnsan ve insan. 5(18), 259-277. |
| Gürer, T. K. ve Yücel, A. (2005). Bir paradigma olarak mimari temsilin incelenmesi. İTÜ dergisi/a mimarlık, planlama, tasarım. 4(1), 84-96. | |
| Kandemir,Ö ve Küçükersen, F ( 2019). Mekân Tasarımcısı İçin Çizme Eyleminin Bilinci: Çizim Araçları-Ortamlarının Değerlendirilmesi. Uluslararası Hakemli Tasarım ve Mimarlık Dergisi. 16 (sonbahar-kış), 163-198. | |
| Kıyıcı, G. (2017). Üretken bir diyaloğun aracısı olarak mimari çizim. İTÜ Mimarlık Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul. | |
| Tan, F. (2013). Çizim mimarlığı: Mimari bir motivasyon olarak çizim. İTÜ Mimarlık Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul. | |
| World Architecture Festival https://www.worldarchitecturefestival.com/live/en/page/why-attend |
Evaluation Method and Passing Criteria
| In-Term Studies | Quantity | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Attendance | - | - |
| Practice | - | - |
| Field Study | - | - |
| Course Specific Internship (If Any) | - | - |
| Homework | 1 | 20 (%) |
| Presentation | - | - |
| Projects | - | - |
| Listening | - | - |
| Midterms | 1 | 30 (%) |
| Final Exam | 1 | 50 (%) |
| Total | 100 (%) | |
ECTS / Working Load Table
| Quantity | Duration | Total Work Load | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Course Week Number and Time | 14 | 2 | 28 |
| Out-of-Class Study Time (Pre-study, Library, Reinforcement) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Midterms | 1 | 20 | 20 |
| Quiz | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Homework | 1 | 20 | 20 |
| Practice | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Laboratory | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Project | 2 | 6 | 12 |
| Workshop | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Presentation/Seminar Preparation | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Fieldwork | 1 | 20 | 20 |
| Final Exam | 1 | 20 | 20 |
| Other | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total Work Load: | 120 | ||
| Total Work Load / 30 | 4 | ||
| Course ECTS Credits: | 4 | ||
Course - Learning Outcomes Matrix
| Relationship Levels | ||||
| Lowest | Low | Medium | High | Highest |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| # | Learning Outcomes | P1 | P3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| O1 | Explaining the relationship between environment and human being | 5 | - |
| O2 | Learn to use dimensional and functional basic needs of human-environment interaction in design | 5 | - |
| O3 | Ability to connect environment and interior space | 5 | - |
| O4 | To comprehend the historical meaning of interior architecture, to follow the developments of the periods and to analyze their differences | - | 5 |