Architecture
Course Details
KTO KARATAY UNIVERSITY
Faculty of Fine Arts and Design
Programme of Architecture
Course Details
Faculty of Fine Arts and Design
Programme of Architecture
Course Details
| Course Code | Course Name | Year | Period | Semester | T+A+L | Credit | ECTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 00341456 | Architectural Competition Culture | 2 | Spring | 4 | 2+0+0 | 4 | 4 |
| Course Type | Elective |
| Course Cycle | Bachelor's (First Cycle) (TQF-HE: Level 6 / QF-EHEA: Level 1 / EQF-LLL: Level 6) |
| Course Language | Turkish |
| Methods and Techniques | Midterm, homework, final. |
| Mode of Delivery | Face to Face |
| Prerequisites | There are no prerequisites. |
| Coordinator | - |
| Instructor(s) | Asst. Prof. Betül HATİPOĞLU ŞAHİN |
| Instructor Assistant(s) | - |
Course Instructor(s)
| Name and Surname | Room | E-Mail Address | Internal | Meeting Hours |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asst. Prof. Betül HATİPOĞLU ŞAHİN | - | [email protected] |
Course Content
Competition definition, competition examples in the world and in Turkey, housing competitions, public building competitions, mosque competitions
Objectives of the Course
This course aims to examine the definition of architectural competition, its purpose, and types of competitions in the world and in Turkey. It aims to read and evaluate competition projects for different building groups.
Contribution of the Course to Field Teaching
| Basic Vocational Courses | |
| Specialization / Field Courses | |
| Support Courses | X |
| Transferable Skills Courses | |
| Humanities, Communication and Management Skills Courses |
Relationships between Course Learning Outcomes and Program Outcomes
| Relationship Levels | ||||
| Lowest | Low | Medium | High | Highest |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| # | Program Learning Outcomes | Level |
|---|---|---|
| P1 | To have multidimensional knowledge and understanding in the field of architecture. To have the ability to use this knowledge to make the necessary applications in the related field. | 4 |
| P3 | To have the ability to develop discourse, theory and practice by developing new concepts by having the knowledge of historical, geographical, social and cultural context to design and plan in the field of architecture. | 4 |
Course Learning Outcomes
| Upon the successful completion of this course, students will be able to: | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| No | Learning Outcomes | Outcome Relationship | Measurement Method ** |
| O1 | To obtain the ability to apply theoretical and conceptual knowledge. | P.1.1 | 1 |
| O2 | To obtain the ability to apply scientific and technical knowledge. | P.1.2 | 1 |
| O3 | Being able to distinguish and define the concepts of architectural design idea, context and architectural program. | P.1.3 | 1 |
| O4 | Skills on identifying the architectural problem, collecting the necessary information, merge and evaluation. | P.3.1 | 1 |
| ** Written Exam: 1, Oral Exam: 2, Homework: 3, Lab./Exam: 4, Seminar/Presentation: 5, Term Paper: 6, Application: 7 | |||
Weekly Detailed Course Contents
| Week | Topics |
|---|---|
| 1 | Description of competitions, purpose and importance of competitions |
| 2 | Contest Regulations and Grouping of Contests |
| 3 | Process in Competitions |
| 4 | Actors in the world of competition |
| 5 | Actors in the competition environment in Turkey |
| 6 | Competition projects in public buildings |
| 7 | Competition projects in public buildings |
| 8 | Midterm |
| 9 | Competition projects in housing |
| 10 | Competition projects in mosque |
| 11 | Competition projects in urban space |
| 12 | Student presentations |
| 13 | Student presentations |
| 14 | Student presentations |
Textbook or Material
| Resources | Aksu, A. (2013). Mimari Tasarım/Proje Yarışmaları Kuramsal Söylemler Üretebilir Mi? Dosya 31, 1, 1-4. |
| Chupin, J.P., Cucuzzella, C. ve Helal, B. (2015). Architecture Competitions and the Production of Culture, Quality and Knowledge. Montreal: Potential Architecture Books | |
| Guilherme, P. (2016). The Relevance of International Design Competitions. J. E. Andersson, G. B. Zettersten, & M. Rönn içinde, Architectural Competitions As Institution and Process. 225-261. Stockholm: The Royal Institute of Technology. |
Evaluation Method and Passing Criteria
| In-Term Studies | Quantity | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Attendance | - | - |
| Practice | - | - |
| Field Study | - | - |
| Course Specific Internship (If Any) | - | - |
| Homework | - | - |
| Presentation | - | - |
| Projects | - | - |
| Listening | - | - |
| Midterms | 1 | 40 (%) |
| Final Exam | 1 | 60 (%) |
| Total | 100 (%) | |
ECTS / Working Load Table
| Quantity | Duration | Total Work Load | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Course Week Number and Time | 2 | 15 | 30 |
| Out-of-Class Study Time (Pre-study, Library, Reinforcement) | 3 | 15 | 45 |
| Midterms | 1 | 10 | 10 |
| Quiz | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Homework | 4 | 5 | 20 |
| Practice | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Laboratory | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Project | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Workshop | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Presentation/Seminar Preparation | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Fieldwork | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Final Exam | 1 | 15 | 15 |
| Other | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total Work Load: | 120 | ||
| Total Work Load / 30 | 4 | ||
| Course ECTS Credits: | 4 | ||
Course - Learning Outcomes Matrix
| Relationship Levels | ||||
| Lowest | Low | Medium | High | Highest |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| # | Learning Outcomes | P1 | P3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| O1 | To obtain the ability to apply theoretical and conceptual knowledge. | 4 | - |
| O2 | To obtain the ability to apply scientific and technical knowledge. | 4 | - |
| O3 | Being able to distinguish and define the concepts of architectural design idea, context and architectural program. | 4 | - |
| O4 | Skills on identifying the architectural problem, collecting the necessary information, merge and evaluation. | - | 4 |